Crazy to think Mortal Kombat has been around for over thirty years. Long enough now to have gone through multiple reboots and eras.
As followers of this blog would guess, I'm of the older generation. My time was the original timeline from the first Mortal Kombat of 1992 to 2006's Armageddon—nicknamed by some the "Midway Era." I effectively called it quits come Mortal Kombat 9 and later embraced Kitana's MKX ending as my canon ending to the story as a whole (see the fifth part of the Kitana Retrospective for more on that).
I do still peek at what's going on in the story and characters I care about, but I've accepted my time as an active Mortal Kombat fan passed long ago.
Younger and more recent fans might not realize, but once upon a time...before the reboots and retcons and rewrites...if I were to single out who the true protagonists or "main characters" of Mortal Kombat were, it would be these two:
Yes, Liu Kang was the hero who saved the day at the end, and there is definitely something to be said about Scorpion and even Reptile, among a handful of others.
But, in terms of fleshed out backstory, motivation, conflict and development—the things that actually make a compelling protagonist in a story—the two leads of the original generation were easily the younger Sub-Zero and Kitana.
An interesting thing when looking at their respective characters and how they progressed over the years is how much they parallel one another, which is what I want to look at with this blog post.
So let's compare and contrast Sub-Zero and Kitana and see how they align and differ....







